After soliciting input from members and others, STAR presents this updated light rail and bus framework.

The framework is offered as a better model for SacRT to use in identifying routes for light rail or bus service expansion or enhancement. Too often, decisions have been made on political criteria without study of alternatives and community engagement. The most effective transit system, on a limited capital and operations budget, can only be achieved through effective planning that considers all alternatives and benefits.

When extending or enhancing the transit network, no decision should be made on transit mode (light rail, High Capacity Bus Service, bus rapid transit (BRT), or bus enhancement) until after the best route is determined based on clear criteria:

1. Existing ridership: Focus on existing high ridership routes. Route 51 Stockton/Broadway and Route 81 Florin are clear leaders, each almost double the next six routes. Better service for existing riders is as important as service for new riders.
2. New ridership: potential for replacement of motor vehicle trips with transit trips on high traffic corridors
3. Population density within 1/2 mile of stations. Low density areas should not be served unless there is clear policy and action towards significant densification. 
4. Access to major job centers, hospitals, higher education, and retail facilities within 1/2 mile of stations
5. Connections to other light rail or high frequency buses
6. Income and environmental justice characteristics around stations. Past history of disinvestment or discrimination must be addressed. 
7. Roadway right-of-way sufficient for light rail or BRT

Light rail expansion should consider both extension of existing routes and infill along high ridership and demand routes. All potential routes should be evaluated on the same criteria. 

Light rail will NOT serve areas of agricultural, wildlife, or undeveloped land. STAR believes greenfield development is climate negative and fiscally irresponsible, so serving new or proposed greenfield development is wrong. 

Light Rail and Bus Framework (pdf)

• Green Line to the Airport
• SacRT
• STAR