Category: SacRT Governance

AB 1924 board governance mistake

AB 1924, Sacramento Regional Transit District, lead author Nguyen, has apparently passed the Assembly and the Senate, and is awaiting Assembly confirmation of amendments. It is not clear whether there will be any committee meetings at which the public can comment. AB 1924, when introduced, was just about cleaning up some language related to annexation … Continue reading AB 1924 board governance mistake

AB 1924 for SacRT annexation

Assemblymember Stephanie Nguyen (District 10) introduced AB 1924: Sacramento Regional Transit District, on January 25, and amended March 6. Co-authors include Assembly members Heath Flora (District 9), Josh Hoover (District 7), and Kevin McCarty (District 6), and Senate members Angelique Ashby (District 8) and Roger Niello (District 6). The legislation would amend Public Utilities Code … Continue reading AB 1924 for SacRT annexation

SacRT Board meeting March 11

The SacRT Board of Directors meeting will be this coming Monday, March 11, 2024, starting at 4:30PM. The agenda does not appear to include anything earthshaking or controversial. The public can attend the meeting in person, at SacRT Headquarters, 1400 29th St, or view it online via YouTube during the meeting, or afterwards on cable. … Continue reading SacRT Board meeting March 11

SacRT Board votes to reduce representation for Sac City and Sac County

Note: The table below, showing board members and voting percentage compared to population, was updated to include the City of Sacramento proposal by board member Rick Jennings, option 5. Though this proposal was described in the text, it was not included in the table. The city proposal chart, included in the board agenda item, is … Continue reading SacRT Board votes to reduce representation for Sac City and Sac County

STAR opposes SacRT board voting proposal

The upcoming February 26, 2024 SacRT board meeting has agenda item 7.2 on board composition and voting. Sacramento Transit Advocates and Riders (STAR) opposes the motion because it locks in the current one seat-one vote voting mechanism, which STAR believes is flawed. All three options maintain this pattern. STAR believes that: SacRT board voting should … Continue reading STAR opposes SacRT board voting proposal